Making of Modern Georgia, 1918-2012
Del av serien
Kort om boken
Innbundet
Bok med hardt omslag.
-
Pocket
Heftet bok med mykt omslag.
-
Kartonert
Bok med tykke, stive sider.
-
E-Bok
Digitalt format. E-bok kan leses i ARK-appen eller på Kindle. Bøkene kan også lastes ned fra Din side.
Nedlastbar lydbok
Digitalt format. Nedlastbar lydbok kan lyttes til i ARK-appen. Bøkene kan også lastes ned fra Din side.
-
Digikort lydbok
Lydbok på digikort. Krever Digispiller.
Compact Disc
Lydbok eller musikk på CD. Krever CD-spiller eller annen kompatibel avspiller.
-
Vinyl
Vinylplate. Krever platespiller.
-
DVD
DVD-film. Krever DVD-spiller eller annen kompatibel avspiller.
-
Blu-ray
Blu-ray-film. Krever Blu-ray-spiller eller annen kompatibel avspiller.
Fri frakt - på kjøp over 249,-
Alltid bytterett - Norges beste. Bytt uten kvittering.Om Making of Modern Georgia
When most of Eastern Europe was struggling with dictatorships of one kind or another, the Democratic Republic of Georgia (1918-1921) established a constitution, a parliamentary system with national elections, an active opposition, and a free press. Like the Democratic Republic of Georgia in 1918, its successors emerged after 1991 from a bankrupt empire, and faced, yet again, the task of establishing a new economic, political and social system from scratch. In both 1918 and 1991, Georgia was confronted with a hostile Russia and followed a pro-Western and pro-democratic course. The top regional experts in this book explore the domestic and external parallels between the Georgian post-colonial governments of the early twentieth and twenty-first centuries. How did the inexperienced Georgian leaders in both eras deal with the challenge of secessionism, what were their state building strategies, and what did democracy mean to them? What did their electoral systems look like, why were their economic strategies so different, and how did they negotiate with the international community neighbouring threats. These are the central challenges of transitional governments around the world today. Georgia's experience over one hundred years suggests that both history and contemporary political analysis offer the best (and most interesting) explanation of the often ambivalent outcomes.