Talking to Our Selves
Kort om boken
Innbundet
Bok med hardt omslag.
-
Pocket
Heftet bok med mykt omslag.
-
Kartonert
Bok med tykke, stive sider.
-
E-Bok
Digitalt format. E-bok kan leses i ARK-appen eller på Kindle. Bøkene kan også lastes ned fra Din side.
Nedlastbar lydbok
Digitalt format. Nedlastbar lydbok kan lyttes til i ARK-appen. Bøkene kan også lastes ned fra Din side.
-
Digikort lydbok
Lydbok på digikort. Krever Digispiller.
Compact Disc
Lydbok eller musikk på CD. Krever CD-spiller eller annen kompatibel avspiller.
-
Vinyl
Vinylplate. Krever platespiller.
-
DVD
DVD-film. Krever DVD-spiller eller annen kompatibel avspiller.
-
Blu-ray
Blu-ray-film. Krever Blu-ray-spiller eller annen kompatibel avspiller.
Fri frakt - på kjøp over 249,-
Alltid bytterett - Norges beste. Bytt uten kvittering.Om Talking to Our Selves
John M. Doris presents a new account of agency and responsibility, which reconciles our understanding of ourselves as moral agents with psychological research on the unconscious mind. Much philosophical theorizing maintains that the exercise of morally responsible agency consists in judgment and behavior ordered by accurate reflection. On such theories, when human beings are able to direct their lives in the manner philosophers have dignified with the honorific'agency', it's because they know what they're doing, and why they're doing it. This understanding is compromised by quantities of psychological research on unconscious processing, which suggests that accurate reflection is distressingly uncommon; very often behavior is ordered by surprisingly inaccurateself-awareness. Thus, if agency requires accurate reflection, people seldom exercise agency, and skepticism about agency threatens. To counter the skeptical threat, John M. Doris proposes an alternative theory that requires neither reflection nor accurate self-awareness: he identifies a dialogic form of agency where self-direction is facilitated by exchange of the rationalizations with which people explain and justify themselves to one another. The result is a stoutly interdisciplinary theorysensitive to both what human beings are like-creatures with opaque and unruly psychologies-and what they need: an account of agency sufficient to support a practice of moral responsibility.